News Summary

The Michigan Attorney General’s office announced it will not pursue a retrial for ex-officer Christopher Schurr, who faced second-degree murder charges in the fatal shooting of Patrick Lyoya during a traffic stop. The initial jury trial ended in a hung jury, reflecting the complexities of law enforcement practices and community relations in a racially charged context. The case has sparked significant public discourse and protests, highlighting ongoing concerns about police use of force.

Grand Rapids, Michigan

The Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office announced its decision not to pursue a retrial for former Grand Rapids police officer Christopher Schurr, who faced charges of second-degree murder in the shooting death of Patrick Lyoya during a routine traffic stop in April 2022. This decision follows a jury trial where jurors struggled to reach a consensus, initially deadlocking at 4-4-4 before shifting to a 7-5, and finally arriving at a 10-2 vote that leaned towards a not guilty verdict.

Kent County Prosecuting Attorney Christopher Becker confirmed the jury’s outcome, which included considerations of a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter. The incident that led to these charges occurred when Schurr shot Lyoya in the back of the head after a physical altercation triggered by a traffic stop concerning a mismatched license plate.

The altercation between Schurr and Lyoya lasted over two minutes, during which Schurr lost control of his Taser. Schurr has maintained that he feared for his life during the encounter, believing he would not survive if he did not discharge his weapon. The tragic event was documented through body camera footage and video from a bystander, both of which captured the moments leading up to the shooting. The images sparked significant public outrage and protests in Grand Rapids.

Following the incident, Schurr was terminated from the police department, following a recommendation from Police Chief Eric Winstrom. The jury’s determination of a hung status was announced in court on May 8, 2025, in the presence of supporters and family members of both Schurr and Lyoya.

During the trial, Schurr testified that he was “running on fumes” as the struggle ensued, asserting that he felt compelled to act to protect himself. Legal experts representing both the prosecution and defense provided contrasting perspectives on the reasonableness of Schurr’s actions during the encounter. The case drew considerable attention, not only because of the incident itself but also due to the racial dynamics involved; Schurr is a white police officer and Lyoya was a Black man. This context aligns with ongoing national discussions concerning police use of force and the treatment of minorities within the justice system.

Background of the Incident

The incident unfolded when Schurr initiated a traffic stop due to a mismatch in Lyoya’s vehicle’s license plate. As the stop progressed, a struggle occurred, during which Lyoya attempted to flee. Schurr reported losing control of his Taser and believed that he was in a life-threatening situation when he shot Lyoya. Eyewitnesses and expert testimonies were introduced during the trial to provide insights regarding the nature of the struggle and the justification for the use of deadly force.

The jury’s mixed verdict, which culminated in a hung jury, reflects the complexities surrounding the case and the diverse opinions about the appropriateness of Schurr’s response during the confrontation. The decision not to pursue retrial signals a significant closing chapter in the legal proceedings related to the tragic event, which resonated not only within the Grand Rapids community but across the nation.

As reactions continue to emerge from various community groups and legal analysts, the case serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges involved in policing practices, community relations, and the pursuit of justice within a heavily scrutinized legal framework.